QRZ! Ham Radio 5/QRZ Ham Radio Callsign Database - Volume 5.iso/digests/infoham/940501.txt

Internet Message Format | 1994-11-13 | 25.4 KB

Date: Sat,  7 May 94 23:09:04 PDT
From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <[e-mail]>
Errors-To: [e-mail]
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: Info-Hams Digest V94 #501
To: Info-Hams


Info-Hams Digest            Sat,  7 May 94       Volume 94 : Issue  501

Today's Topics:
                     Batteries for Kenwood TH-78A
                  Best code-speed improvement tapes?
         Call For Papers & Demos FOR 1994 ARRL SW Convention
                     Cruise ship radio operation
                digital speech transmission for HAMs?
                   Gun Owners: Protect your Rights!
                              Ham jargon
                  Help! Intermod/440/Knwd732/filter?
         Info Needed: Packet with FT5100 and Baycom interface
                        Need some QSL-info...
                          QSL routes - A43YY
                           RC motor control
                      Sell or Swap          1/2
                      Sell or Swap          2/2
                               simplex
                      Ten-Tec Address (or fax #

Send Replies or notes for publication to: <[e-mail]>
Send subscription requests to: <[e-mail]>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to [e-mail].

Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams".

We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party.  Your mileage may vary.  So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sat, 7 May 1994 12:34:05 CDT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!news.eecs.uic.edu!uicvm.uic.edu![e-mail]
Subject: Batteries for Kenwood TH-78A
To: [e-mail]

The best thing to do with this kind of radio is to use it as a cross-band
repeat hand-held thru another kenwood base or mobile doing the cross-
band-repeating, such as a 732, 741, 742 etc. Then you can run the
milliwatt power level, run it all day, never worry about running out, and
always have a plenty good signal. Write me for more comments if you please.
Ed Gordon
AA9IF
[e-mail]

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 7 May 1994 12:18:23 CDT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!news.eecs.uic.edu!uicvm.uic.edu![e-mail]
Subject: Best code-speed improvement tapes?
To: [e-mail]

Hi! Name is Ed. QTH Univ of IL, Chicago. My advice: don't use tapes, or
at least, don't use ONLY tapes. For me, I tended to remember the message
on the tape, so they were really only good ONE TIME THROUGH! After 2 or
3 times thru the tape, I knew what was coming. I only had to 'decode'
the first letter or two and I knew the rest of the message. Although this
is good to instill confidence, and also helps reinforce, since you can
be writing and 'verifying-copying' as you're listening, you really don't
get the same effect that you will when you take the test (or when you
have a QSO on CW, for that matter). What WOULD I recommend? I hope you
have a PC. Get MorseTutor or SuperMorse. Ask around, one of them is
usually available either from another ham or a bulletin board system
(BBS) in your area. Probably could get it from an ftp site on internet.
If you don't own a PC and don't need one for anything else (hard for
me to picture that, but I suppose it's possible), try to get access
to one (borrow, rent, go to local school/unioversity/library or
something). SECOND SUGGESTION: Code practice broadcasts from W1AW. The
schedule is printed in QST each month (available at most magazine
stands) and many other sources. Ask another ham. I don't have the
sked in front of me or I'd list it here... but this is great
practice, if you have a receiver, because the messages include sentences
and random letters/numbers such as long lists of contest scores.
It starts out at 5, goes to 7.5, and then 10, 13 and 15 words per minute
(something like that). It kinda encourages you to push your speed if
you want to keep listening. It's on like twice a day, check the sked.
I know whatcha mean about the Advanced, I stopped there fro a few years
myself... was always frightened of the 20 wpm. OH, ONE MORE HINT:
If you were to put in one hour a week, it might take 250 hours to get up
to speed (five years time). If you practiced 5 hours a day, it might take
you a total of 65 hours , or less than three weeks. Of course you can't
practice 5 hours a day (who knows, maybe you could, I couldn't), but the
point is, the more hours you put in per day, not only the less elapsed
time is it going to take, the less TOTAL time it's going to take, because
each time you start up, you don't have to spend so much time getting back
up to the speed you left off at (it tends to leak out of your brain as
you are resting between sessions, slowing your speed down). So GO AT IT
AS HARD AS YOU CAN, time-wise, often-wise, and effort-wise. Practicing
with headphones is also a tremendous boost.

       73 and good luck!

Ed Gordon
AA9IF
[e-mail]

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 6 May 1994 09:22:42 -0600
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!gatech!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!alberta!ve6mgs![e-mail]
Subject: Call For Papers & Demos FOR 1994 ARRL SW Convention
To: [e-mail]

VHF'ERS, MICROWAVERS, LASEROOS!
CALL FOR TALKS & DEMOS
1994 ARRL SW DIVISION CONVENTION - SAN DIEGO WILL BE AUGUST 26, 27, AND 28

MICROWAVE GROUP OF SAN DIEGO HAS BEEN ASKED TO ORGANIZE
VHF/UHF/MICROWAVE/LASER SHOW & TELL

WE HAVE TWO HOURS SUNDAY MORNING, AUG 28 IN THE LARGEST CONFERENCE ROOM
FROM O900-1100

IF YOU HAVE A TALK OR EQUIPMENT TO SHOW OFF, HURRY & TELL US!  WRITE OR
CALL WITH A BIEF SUMMARY, ASAP! TO:

ED MUNN, 6255 RADCLIFFE DR SAN DIEGO 92122
[phone] EVENINGS, FAX [phone]
PACKET W6OYJ@WB6DGR.#SOCA.CA
INTERNET munn@nosc,mil

KERRY BANKE, 6026 POPPY ST, LA MESA CA 91942
[phone] EVENINGS, FAX [phone]
INTERNET [e-mail]

TOPICS FROM BEGINNER TO EXPERT WELCOME


********************
Kerry Banke
[e-mail]
Qualcomm Inc.
[phone]
Q-102S

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 8 May 1994 02:53:35 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA![e-mail]
Subject: Cruise ship radio operation
To: [e-mail]

In a previous article, [e-mail] (Martin E Hartwell x2091) says:

> I just returned from a cruise to the Caribbean, if you could only see my
smile. Anyway other than having a real good time I did stop at the radio
room of the ship and talked to the operator. I was standing in the
reception room outside the actual room that contained the equipment. The operator gave me
>a complete tour of his world, low band, vhf, satellite, fax, eg. Really a
>small room. On this ship there were two low band, around 8 MHZ inverted
>vee antannas. He said one was primary and the other secondary, or spare.

>The operator I talked to kind of implied that a lot of the ship to shore
was handled by satellite now but some went by way of low band. In fact he
was talking to the AT&T operator in New York as I came up to the window.
>
This might not be new info for some readers of this newsgroup but for
those who are interested, you CAN copy this ship-to-shore phone patch
traffic on the HF bands . . . not only from holiday cruise ships up to and
including the QEII and Carnival Lines but all kinds of other vessels at sea.

AT&T does indeed operate mega-coastal stations with high power (10kw+) and
awesome antenna farms (so they are easily heard). They are KMI in Point
Reyes, CA, WOM in Fort Lauderdale, and WOO in Manahawkin, NJ.

They are duplex operations (split xmit and rx freqs.) but most
decent receivers or transceivers with general coverage receive
will let you set two VFO frequencies. You just have to flip back and
forth between the two frequencies to hear both sides of the conversation. They
operate on a variety of specified marine channels in the HF bands in the
ranges of:

                      * NOTE: MINUS OFFSET VARIES BY BAND IN USE
4355 - 4430 KHz (ships transmit approx. 294.6 KHz lower than shore stn.)
8722 - 8811 KHz ( ..................... 523.9 KHZ .....................)
13100 - 13190 KHz ( ....................770.8 KHz .....................)
17230 - 17330 KHz ( ....................772.9 KHz .....................)
22620 - 22705 KHz ( ....................596.0 KHz .....................)

There is lots of interesting phone traffic here, from vacationers calling
the family back home to ship crews messaging home base etc. Depending on
propagation and your QTH, some bands might be more favourable than others
but the 8 MHz band is a good place to start listening, especially if you
know 40 metres is in good shape.

Sure, it might be a little voyeuristic, but as long as the airwaves are
public domain and until they start scrambling the stuff up to birds,
listen away and have fun!

Cheers and 73...Rob

--
Robin Ludlow, VE3YE
Orleans, Ontario, Canada
[e-mail]

------------------------------

Date: 6 May 1994 14:03:44 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!darwin.sura.net!hearst.acc.Virginia.EDU!portal.gmu.edu!fame.gmu.edu![e-mail]
Subject: digital speech transmission for HAMs?
To: [e-mail]

    There are a few issues with digital voice for hams.

    16Kbits/sec sounds pretty good with current technology.  New
digital systems are getting acceptable sound over 8Kbits/sec.  For those
of you who aren't familiar with them, the military has STU-III phones
that give voice capability at 2.4kbits/sec.  Now the voice is only as
good as it will map to the model of the human vocal system in the phone.

    A question that would have to be addressed would be coding.
Would it be a data stream that is transmitted when you push the button,
or would it be packets in a TDMA scheme?  There are also legal issues
with some things like CDMA.

    The other question is bandwidth.  Now for US hams the FCC has
set a specific deviation for all digital codes.  If we where to have a
minimum singal to noise ratio set, a maximum signaling rate could be
determined and modems designed.  Another possibility is to use NBFM and
run an audio modulation into an HT or mobile rig.  This way current RF
equipment will remain the same and all that will be needed is a digital
front end.  Again repeat calculations and determine the level of service
to quality of sound trade-offs.

    Good luck and 73,
        Shawn KE4GHS

--
Shawn C. Masters
[e-mail]

    I speak for myself, not my department or institution.

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 8 May 94 04:59:34 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!udel!news2.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!dg-rtp!webo!wellspring![e-mail]
Subject: Gun Owners: Protect your Rights!
To: [e-mail]

In article <2q6lu4$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Chris Moore) writes:
>[e-mail] wrote:
>: Gun owners protect your constitutional rights!
>
>Thank you for posting this to the wrong newsgroup.  If you had put it
>in the appropriate gun-related newsgroup, I wouldn't have known about
>it.  Now I can call my Congressman and urge him to vote YES on any
>bill that bans assault rifles.
**********************************************************

    Just so you know, assault RIFLES( are a real thing. old timers VETS
 might remember the term BATTLE RIFLE)  an assault WEAPON is a made up term
 intended to instegate fear. It is a BUZZ word made up by the media and your
 frends at the (we know whats best for you) HCI.

    You sir, might be conserned, that the right (FREEDOM) we all here (USA)
  enjoy the right to speak about what ever we want, how ever we what, when ever, is not the next right go in this administration's trash heap...

    You think "THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN HERE"  find, and take a good look
  at the much ballied  Omnibus Crime Bill.  It was provisions in it to arrest
  people that protest ,fed gov,  action..  Don't just post back that I am full
 of sh!t, look it up..   The stuff that the Clinton croud are doing,and saying
 is scary.  See what they are tring to do in Chicago,  hint(warentless searches.    Well that is more that enough off topic from me..

--
73/ al
--

BTW:  I am sorry to post off topic.   Email discution , or T.P.G.
  flames??PLUNK...



 Did I drop my .sig in the coffee???                 Al Brackett
 N1IQQ @ KA1RCI.RI (for those that know)      [e-mail]
  Work For Peace / Plan For Conflict  /            HONOR  ALWAYS
 [insert] Standard Disclamer Here<   >      BLESS / PEACE

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 7 May 94 18:59:44 -0500
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!gatech!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!news.duke.edu!eff!news.kei.com!news.byu.edu!news.mtholyoke.edu!nic.umass.edu!noc.near.net!news.delphi.com![e-mail]
Subject: Ham jargon
To: [e-mail]

Terry Burge <[e-mail]> writes:

>I still like "destinated" meaning you have arrived at your destination.

CB lingo from the 70's.

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 7 May 1994 12:02:01 CDT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!news.eecs.uic.edu!uicvm.uic.edu![e-mail]
Subject: Help! Intermod/440/Knwd732/filter?
To: [e-mail]

Thanks for reading this... I have a remote base setup in Chicago that is
almost unuseable due to intermod (or something...???) on the 440 band.
It seems the paging companies just splatter megawatts all over the place
indiscriminately, but that is another discussion (altho I'd be happy
to entertain your thoughts on THAT matter too...).
   WHAT CAN I DO about the 440 splatter? I have a dual band (high gain /
high altitude) antenna feeding a diplexer which splits 2M and 440 into
seperate cables into the Kenwood 732. I could put a band-pass filter
on the 440 side only.
   Do you know where I can buy such a filter, or plans for one, or
or have any other suggestions? I'd rather buy than build, yes, I'm
an "appliance operator", rather just plug n play. But will build
if I have no recourse. Thanks for your reply! Please E-mail it to me. 73!

Ed Gordon
[e-mail]
AA9IF
******************

------------------------------

Date: 7 May 1994 18:18:18 -0500
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!gatech!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!news.duke.edu!convex!bcm!news.tamu.edu![e-mail]
Subject: Info Needed: Packet with FT5100 and Baycom interface
To: [e-mail]

 I am using my FT5100 rig with the baycom interface for packet and i am
having the following problem, the audio send from the baycom interface to
the rig is too low. This problem occur's when i have the rig connected to
the baycom interface via the data connector found at the back of the
FT5100. Any one had the same problem ? Any suggestions? Thank you in advance.

73's de 5b4acp
op:Pantelis

------------------------------

Date: 7 May 1994 21:43:36 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!sunic!trane.uninett.no!nntp.uio.no!nntp-oslo.uninett.no!mac_inge![e-mail]
Subject: Need some QSL-info...
To: [e-mail]

Hi...

I don't know if this is the right place to ask for
QSL info.

Anyway, I need the QSL-info for the following stations:
P29WK    (worked 30/4-94)
JW0C    (worked 29/4-94)
7Q7ZZ    (worked 29/4-94)
OD5MM    (worked 29/4-94)
KH2/VP9BP    (worked 27/4-94)
GD0ADV    (worked 27/4-94)
J68BE    (worked 27/4-94)
C53HG    (worked 27/4-94)
A92EV    (worked 25/4-94)
Z21JE    (Worked 25/4-94)
VP8GAV    (worked 24/4-94)
J28GG   (worked 22/4-94)
FR5ZU/E    (worked 19/4-94)
4K2MAL    (worked 19/4-94)
JY5IN    (worked 1/2-94)
TI4CF    (worked 23/1-94)
CN2AQ    (worked 29/12-93)
A43YY    (worked 23/12-93)


vy 73 de Tom/LA1BJA/JW1BJA
P.S. QSL MANAGER FOR JW1BJA IS LA5VK....

tomrune@mac_inge.itek.norut.no

------------------------------

Date: 7 May 1994 22:06:14 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!astro.as.utexas.edu![e-mail]
Subject: QSL routes - A43YY
To: [e-mail]

tomrune@mac_inge (Tom Rune Lauknes) asks:

>I need the QSL-info for the following stations:

>A43YY    (worked 23/12-93)

    If anyone knows the A43YY route, please le me know too.  I have
    been getting QSL requests for QSOs with this station.  I think
    I know how this happened - A43YY had a QSO with 9V1YC on the above
    date, and someone heard 9V1YC say "QSL via AA5BT" and attributed
    that to A43YY.   Anyway, I'm not the manager, and would like to know
    who is, or at where the information that I am the manager appears so
    that I can correct it.


Derek Wills (AA5BT, G3NMX)
Department of Astronomy, University of Texas,
Austin TX 78712.  (512-471-1392)
[e-mail]

------------------------------

Date: 7 May 1994 22:12:17 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!library.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!csus.edu!mercury![e-mail]
Subject: RC motor control
To: [e-mail]

Hi all,

    I am interested in using servo motors of the type used in model
airplanes for general radio control applications. These motors rotate
through an angle theta which is linearly proportional to a pulse modulated
control voltage. There is a standard method of multiplexing several such
data channels into a repeated pulse waveform to control several motors. The
commercial systems operate in the 75MHz unlicensed RC band, but I'd like to
be able to operate at other frequencies. If anybody knows anything about
these servo motors, including cheap sources, please let me know. Also,
if anyone knows of some good books on the subject, I'd appreciated the
tip! I know there are hams out there who are into RC and operate their
models in the 6 meter band, so if thats you, let me know how to get
started !!! Thanks for any help.

                    Michael
                    [e-mail]


------------------------------

Date: Fri,  6 May 94 22:18:00 -0700
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!pinyon.libre.com!twb![e-mail]
Subject: Sell or Swap          1/2
To: [e-mail]

From: [e-mail]
Subject: Sell or Swap

 -----------------------------05/01/94-------------------------------

 [1]  VHF Transceivers for sale or swap.
 Date:  Sun May 01: 22:46:21 MST.
 From:  Frederick Franz (WA6VHB)
 Lines:  34
 Distribution: USA

 I have for sale or trade two VHF mobile transceivers.

 (#1)  Icom-230, PLL, synthesized, 67 channels, 146 to 148 Mhz. This
       unit covers the bandwidth in 30 khz increments. This is the
       original band plan for 2 meter repeaters.  E.g., 146.76; 146.79;
       146.94, etc.  The repeater offsets are -600 and +600khz.  The
       radio also operates on any of the simplex frequencies, e.g.146.52;
       146.55; 146.58 etc.  The power output is 10 W. This unit features
       an analog type S meter.   The radio does not have DTMF or PL
       (CTCSS), however there is a an accessory connector for 9V. power
       take-off and audio input. (I have used this for external DTMF and
       it works fine).  The unit also has a jack for external speaker.
            Price is $100.00 OBO.  (See swap info below).

 (#2)  Icom-280, PLL, synthesized, 559 channels.  143.9-145.995 Mhz in
       5 khz steps.  146.01-148.11 Mhz in 15 khz steps.  This is a later
       version than the Icom-230 for an expanded 2 meter band plan.
       The repeater offsets are -600 and +600 and the radio operates
       simplex on any of the channels.  This radio has a dual power
       output selection of 10 watts or 1 watt.  The frequency display
       is a 4 digit bright red LED type.  This radio also has an analog
       type S meter, and a jack for an external speaker.  Also featured
       is a 3 channel programmable memory.  No DTMF or CTCSS.
            Price is $160.00 OBO.  (See swap info below).

 Both of the above mobile units come in factory boxes with manuals and
 accessories:  mounting bracket; power cord; extra fuse; and hdwe.
 These radios are in good condition and I'll even pay the shipping!

 I'll  trade both of the above radios for a used dual band VHF/UHF
 radio such as the Alinco DR570T, DR592T or DR600T.  (DR570T or
 DR600T preferable).  Or if anyone has dual bander and doesn't want
 to trade, I'll offer cash.  (The amount depending on condition, and
 if manual and accessories are furnished).

      Please contact:  Frederick Franz (WA6VHB)
                       1204 N. Ponderosa Circle
                       Payson, AZ 85541-3843
                       Tel.:  [phone]

 ------------------------------End------------------------------------


 * OLX 1.52 * ---------------------------------------------------------

>|OLX$SOM|
BBS: TWBQWK
Conference: 25,E-MAIL
Number: 6154
Reply-to: 0
Private: YES
Receipt: No
ExHeader: YES
Date: 1994-05-06,14:45
From: [e-mail]
To: WILLIAM ECKLE
Subject: Your post to rec.radio.amateur
Flags:

Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
This site has received a news article entitled

 Sellc or Swap

apparently posted by you to a questionable group or groups:

 rec.radio.amateur is not a real USENET group. If your site treats
  it as valid, this is most likely due to a software bug or
  an old accident or prank. Though some other sites may also
  recognize the name, the group is not official and doesn't
  have a large audience. You may want to look at
  rec.radio.amateur.misc instead.


An official list of USENET groups, as well as a partial list of
bogus groups, is regularly posted to news.announce.newgroups and
news.groups.  You may wish to take a look at them.

Your article was not cancelled or reposted to another group.

This is an automatic letter; no reply is necessary.  If you wish
to discuss this message, please contact [e-mail], Kenneth

(Continued to next message)

------------------------------

Date: Fri,  6 May 94 22:18:00 -0700
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!gatech!asuvax!pinyon.libre.com!twb![e-mail]
Subject: Sell or Swap          2/2
To: [e-mail]

(Continued from previous message)

Herron.

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 8 May 1994 03:42:23 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!library.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com![e-mail]
Subject: simplex
To: [e-mail]

Chuck Reti ([e-mail]) wrote:

: One could suggest to another to "go to .52 Direct"
: Just adding to the confusion....

I'd just like to mention that .52 should be used as a "calling" frequency
and that once communication is established, the parties should move off
to one of the other (VERY MANY) other simplex frequencies. This is of
more concern in major metropolitan areas than it is in rural areas where
there is very little activity. Especially on simplex, you may no be
hearing one (or both sides) of a communication.
--
 =============================================
| Phil Petersen, NP2X, Denver, Colorado       | "What comes around goes goes
|          Email - [e-mail]            | around..... Only now, you
|      [e-mail]  [44.20.0.132]      | don't have to wait for it."
|  [e-mail]  [44.20.0.133]      |                   T. Servo
 =============================================

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 6 May 1994 13:09:36 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!gatech!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!news.duke.edu!zombie.ncsc.mil!admii!ovation!ramcad.pica.army.mil![e-mail]
Subject: Ten-Tec Address (or fax #
To: [e-mail]

>References: <[e-mail]>
>
> > I heard an interesting piece of news on our local repeater yesterday
> > about the fact that Ten-Tec now offers 2m amplifier KITS (Yay!) for a
> > reasonable price.
>
> > Sooo, I think I'll ask them for a catalog. Anyone out there have their
> > address, or preferably a fax number?
>
>Ten-Tec has been advertising their offering of kits for several months as
>a side note on part of their ads in the ham magazines.  No specifics,
>though, in any of them.  I haven't called them yet for their catalog but I
>guess I should.
>
>//Steve//
========================================================================
    I sent the original post for Ten-Tec's voice/fax numbers. Sent
    two FAXes so far. Still no catalog. Bummer.

    Guess I'll have to *call* them. Sigh. FAX is so much easier.

            .... Mark E. Ellis <[e-mail]>
                             N2WZB
                             Picatinny Arsenal, NJ

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 8 May 1994 03:06:42 GMT
From: news.Hawaii.Edu!uhunix3.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu![e-mail]
To: [e-mail]

References <[e-mail]>, <2qdm00$[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
Subject : Re: Licencing cost

Speaking of licensing costs I just received a Ship Radio Station License
renewal notice from the FCC: $35. 5 years ago it was free.

Jeff NH6IL (Ship License: WAD7684 - it's for my dinky little sailboat).

------------------------------

End of Info-Hams Digest V94 #501
******************************